Dec 12, 2014
It is my intent as AST Director 2014-16 to communicate clearly and often. I do this for a few reasons. First, I think more information is better. Its frustrating when important information doesn't get into the hands of the people that need it in a timely manner. Its also frustrating when people who have expert opinion and general membership do not feel consulted before important decisions are made. It can also be frustrating to not know clearly how a set of criteria will be interpreted.
The fact is, that no selection criteria are ever perfect or will always capture the intended athletes. In the case of the AST, the criteria are explicitly meant to capture the fastest skiers in Alberta. It is why in my first year in my role, I consulted with coaches from across the province, from big clubs and little clubs, from well established clubs and clubs just gettin going. My sense is, people appreciated being asked and listened to about important matters related to the AST. I followed up those personal interviews, most of which took 45 - 75 minutes of time each, with a survey whose intent was to validate what I had heard in the personal interviews. The results of that survey are found on this blog. What surprised me was the consistency and strength of the responses. I listened, I heard, I validated and then took that information forward to the Technical Committee to inform the creation of the AST selection criteria.
Then, the selection criteria were drafted and distributed for comments from the ski community. The feedback was listened to, weighed carefully, and was then used to inform revisions. A second round of feedback was solicited, afterwhich, the criteria were approved by the Technical Committee of CCA and then the CCA Board of Directors. The criteria were then published as final on the CCA website. The selection criteria were then presented in person to coaches present at the Dec 5 Alberta Cup Team Capts meeting. And because all Alberta coaches were not there, I put together an interpretation document on the AST Director's blog, in response to some of the questions that came up both since the document was published and at the coaches meeting.
Feedback from the vast majority of coaches has been extremely positive. There was a question at the Dec 5 team capts meeting about how the discretionary positions would be filled. The approved criteria state the discretionary positions will be selected based off of performance. That is pretty vague and so at both the coaches meeting and on the blog, some communication was shared to address that vagueness.
Transparency is extremely important to myself. Fairness is also extremely important. Objective criteria that does not include subjective judgements of ability are preferred. In our discussions as a technical committee, discussion centred on how we could make the 'discretionary' positions less subjective and more objective. The purpose of the discretionary positions is to ensure that if some of the best athletes in the province have failed to meet the other criteria, that the discretionary criteria would be used to capture those skiers. Objectivity is the goal - to move away from a group of people deciding something based on their best hunch. CPL points become an objective and valid measure for an athlete's ability relative to same age peers. It is how AST has been selected for the past number of years. The discretionary criteria are meant to capture athletes who have demonstrated ability and high performance based on CPL points, but who for whatever reason, were not able to make it to enough Alberta Cup races to qualify by that criteria. It is my belief that the criteria shouldnt penalize our fastest skiers for looking for options that give them the best possibility of advancing their performance. The fact is that many coaches in Alberta during consultation were hesitant about moving away from CPL as the selection criteria precisely for these reasons. An example from the first AB Cup weekend was CWG selection. Junior boys and girls needed to race out of their category to qualify for CWG on the saturday race. This means those junior boys and girls did not earn 'in category' AB Cup points.
I realize that there is never a perfect solution to selection criteria. The attempt made by the Tech Committee was to build in a net to capture some of those athletes who decided to compete at a level that best advanced their ski performance - e.g. CWG trials.
I have heard from coaches around the province that criteria needs to be objective, based on performance, not the subjective opinion of the technical committee members. To be objective, the discretionary positions need to be assigned using an objective standard like CPL points which are a valid measure of relative performance. This to me is transparent and objective decision making.
The fact is that the Technical Committee might make decisions about selection for the discretionary positions in some other way. As far as CCA policy goes, I will for sure not be on the female selection committee because I have two daughters who compete in cross country skiing. It is yet to be determined if I will be selected to sit on the male AST selection committee.
I appreciate the dialog amongst our ski clubs about the important issues that we face as a ski community interested in advancing competitive cross country skiing in our province. I appreciate the feedback from coaches about the decisions that have been made and the decisions that are to be made. As someone who has been a developmental coach for the past 15 years in Alberta, I want what CCA does to represent the priorities of our membership. CCA initiatives have the potential to make a huge difference in the development of athletes in our province. It is my goal in my role to optimize the benefit to every club in this province - not just the big ones with professional coaches. If we really want to advance skiing in our province, then it is my belief that our efforts need to be focused on what works for small start up clubs and for large clubs with huge budgets in all regions of our province. I think we are doing this, but there is room for lots of improvement.
I encourage you to share your thoughts about these and other important ideas. Questioning is welcome. Ideas are appreciated. Polite and respectful dialog is awesome.
If you'd like to share your thoughts you can email me at firstname.lastname@example.org or give me a call at 403-862-1042 or respond on this blog. I will publish your comments here for all to see. I've decided to start a blog, because in my day job, because of its interactive nature it is a widely used web 2.0 tool used for sharing and learning. If you feel like you've got some ideas that you'd like to make sure that i hear, please send them along. If you feel there is a more objective way of selecting discretionary athletes for AST than CPL points, please share ideas. Subjective decision making where a committee needs to decide on one athlete over another is I believe what most coaches do not want to see happen.
Friday, 12 December 2014
Monday, 8 December 2014
In the spirit of good communication, I thought I'd share a bit of information here about how athletes get selected to the Alberta Ski Teams. The attempt here is to demystify the selection process by sharing in plain language what an athlete needs to do to be selected. It is my belief, that when athletes have a clear image of the goal, they are much more likely to strive to accomplish the goal. The information that follows is meant to accompany the selection criteria found at xcountryab.net
Alberta Ski Team - 2015-16
The first priority to qualifying spots on this team is given to athletes who win a medal at nationals or qualify for the world junior championships team. An athlete who accomplishes one of these two things will be selected ahead of all other athletes qualifying by different criteria. This is meant to ensure that the fastest athletes in Alberta are represented on the AST.
The second way to qualify for the 2015-16 AST is based on the best 6 of 10 finishes in the Alberta Cup Series. Finish positions in races are assigned AB Cup points. Athletes will be selected based on these aggregate points. The athlete with the highest aggregate points from 6 of 10 (or the stated ratio found in the selection criteria document in the event of race cancellations) AB Cup races will be selected for available positions ahead of the athlete with the second highest aggregate points, etc. This is for each of the eligible categories including the birth year groupings of 1999, 1997-98, 1996, 1993-95. A prescribed minimum number of athletes from each of these groupings is assigned in the criteria. The intent of using AB Cup points for selection is to revitalize the AB Cup series as the premier race series for developmental athletes in Alberta.
Are there any other ways that an athelte can be selected for the AST? yes, there are several discretionary positions. These are meant for athletes who did not qualify either by being a national medalist/world jr team athlete or by AB Cup aggregate points but who nonetheless perform at a high level. e.g. an athlete whose CPL points are higher than athletes qualifying by AB Cup aggregate points. This could happen where an athlete chooses to attend a Noram race instead of an AB Cup race because that is the appropriate level of competition for them to improve. Again, the intention is to ensure that the AST includes the fastest skiers in Alberta. If you feel you have an athlete in your club that this applies to, then I'd encourage you to write a letter to the CCA Technical Committee who will review and consider the athlete for a discretionary position.
Alberta Development Team 2015-16
This initiative recognizes athletes born in 1999, 2000, and 2001. To be selected to this team, an athlete must earn Alberta Cup points in the race category intended for them. e.g. for an athlete born in 2001, Alberta Cup points need to be earned in the midget category; for athletes born 1999 and 2000, Alberta Cup points must be earned in the Juvenile category.
Only Alberta Cup points will be used in the selection of athletes for the Alberta Development Team. To be selected to the ADT, athletes born in 2001 and 2000 need to be among the top 5 AB Cup point earners using the best 6 finishes of the 10 Alberta Cup points. Five male athletes and five female athletes born in 2001 and five males and five females born in 2000 will be selected.
Two males and two females born in 1999 will also be selected. As two males and two females born 1999 will be selected to the AST, the 1999 athletes selected to the ADT will be the 3rd and 4th ranked 1999 athletes on the AB Cup point list using their best 6 of 10 AB races. Two males and two females born 1999 will be selected to the ADT.